Sent off my comments on the Energy Review yesterday, to the lady who is co-ordinating them. Switched the radio on this morning at 8:15 (yes, I admit it, I had a lie-in because I was awake at 3 again) to hear some posh bloke (who turned out to be Rowan Williams) apparently quoting from my comments (I have tried to replay the interview on Listen again but it doesn’t seem to be working – maybe it’s too soon).
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/today/listenagain/
The phrase he was using when I switched on was something like: ‘The urgency has to be conveyed to people; it’s not a marginal extra’, and didn’t I just know exactly what he had to be talking about?
The interview was followed by one where John Humphreys berated (sorry, ‘interviewed’) Margaret Beckett, and came out with this classic Humphreysism (I loved it so much I actually wrote this one down):
‘Why are you, the Government, not doing more to persuade us or to force us to change our lifestyles?’
Erm, how about, because this is a democracy, John, and you are usually the first person to go off on one about ‘nanny statism’ at any hint the Government is actually trying to ‘persuade us or to force us to change our lifestyles’???
Later, he made this statement, which he made sound like an accusation: ‘It’s all about politics, isn’t it?’ (Well, yes, what isn’t?) He was saying that politicians are scared to do anything (I’m paraphrasing, because I didn’t write this down at the time) because they can’t see beyond the time horizon of the next election, and they don’t want to antagonise the voters – but what ABOUT the ‘voters’? Don’t they bear any responsibility at all? If individuals choose to continue on our present path, and only elect politicians who will allow them to do so, whose ‘fault’ is it when the inevitable consequences start to become apparent? And what is the point of sitting around bleating about whose ‘fault’ it is anyway, when we’re already so deep in the shit?
One of my Euro-buddies (the Irishman, as it happens), was waxing lyrical on our discussion group the other day about ‘democratic renewal’ – but the voice of the people is not necessarily a progressive one.
I thought about writing a book about all this 8 years ago, but couldn’t be arsed because it all seemed so effing obvious that I couldn’t see the point.
-
- 2006-03-28 @ 14:50:55
-
- 2006-03-28 @ 18:54:02
yeah and also isnt that a bit like a dictatorship with one suprime leader?
all energy must be balenced it goes in circals hence why we draw a spititual ring when we perform magic as u know.
the horned one isnot the only god/goddess am i correct?
no offence ment pbuys -
- http://suzeemoon.friendpages.com/
- 2006-03-28 @ 23:47:41
I agree with you and with Rowan, but want to add my support of your picture of the absurdity of John Humphries' style. I am bright enough to understand the usefulness of playing the Devil's Advocate, but this one trick used regardless over and over is about as sophisticated as Punch and Judy or a pantomime with a chorus of 'Oh, no you didn't!' it would be nice to have some intelligent dialogue rather than a ritualised sparring bout...
-
- 2006-04-02 @ 13:09:50
I know I can’t save the world single handed. Enough people have been saying the same things for long enough, and no one ever takes any notice of them either. It’s just that everything that’s happening is just so close to the way that I would have predicted it, I can’t help thinking, well, if I’d told you so, at least I could have the pleasure of saying ‘Look, I told you so.’ Not that I would have found a publisher, of course.
All the signs are that things are getting unstoppably worse on so many different fronts; climate change is obviously the biggie that will really make a difference, but there are other issues, such as resource depletion; water shortages; over-flowing landfill; housing shortages; traffic gridlock; increasing levels of carcinogens and endocrine disruptors; without even starting on some of the social issues. But I don’t have any solutions to offer, which is another reason to keep my mouth shut. I can just see how things are going to get worse and worse.
Even in my own family, my husband won’t go along with anything which he sees as costing him money in the short term (though I have won him round to buying a lot of our meat and veg from local suppliers). He studied chemistry, and has nothing but contempt for ‘social scientists’, there is no meeting of minds and no point in me trying to explain my ideas to him. My son believes that science will solve everything and save us all. My daughter is in thrall to the ‘24/7 shop-till-you-drop’ culture. I can’t even find the words to explain myself clearly enough to convince my own family, in fact I don’t even try, because I hate confrontation. So I sit here in blogland and fulminate, and think, well, I’m no better than anybody else, so what right do I have to criticise, and I’d better just keep my mouth shut.
Kizlode
One of the problems with giving 'the people' the right to chose the way they live is that you have to be prepared for some of them to chose to live in a way you don't like or that doesn't help with problems like we have now. The problem with writing a book about it all is that the people who need to get the message are exactly the people who would be least likely to read such a book